Friday, May 26, 2017


IAPG-Pakistan: 1st Business Meeting - Minutes



The 1st Business Meeting of IAPG-Pakistan has been held on 15th May, 2017 at 10:00 AM in the Conference Room of the Department of Geology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (AWKUM). 

Coordinator Mr. Muhmmad Yaseen & Co-coordinator Emad Ullah Khan, Lecturers of the Department of Geology - AWKUM chaired the meeting and welcomed the members.

The following members attended the meeting and presented their ideas about the subject "Strengthening of IAPG-Pakistan Section":

1. M. Yaseen, Lecturer.
2. Emad Ullah Khan, Lecturer.
3. Junaid Ali Shah, Research Assistant.
4. Anwer Ali, Superintendent.
5. M. Ibrahim, Field Assistant.

M. Yaseen presented the agenda of the meeting and suggested future strategies and networking of the IAPG-Pakistan section.

In the first half of the meeting, the progress of the IAPG-Pakistan section were discussed in details. 

Furthermore, M. Yaseen suggested that proposals for an international or national level conference for strengthening and widening the impact of IAPG section in Pakistan should be submitted.

Both coordinators presented a report about a field work organized recently to nearby quarry/mines named Nowshera Reef Complex, one of the best exposed reef limestone with abundant fossils. Aims of the geological field work were to collect data about this important geo-heritage site in Pakistan that suffers destructions day by day. 

The same report will be submitted as a research article and will be asked to be uploaded in IAPG blog.

Figure: participants in the 1st Business Meeting of IAPG-Pakistan to discuss about the strategy for promoting geoethics in Pakistan.


IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Thursday, May 25, 2017


IAPG and GfGD sign an agreement for cooperation



On 24th May 2017, Silvia Peppoloni (IAPG Secretary General) and Joel Gill (GfGD President) has signed a Memorandum of Agreement between IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics and GfGD - Geology for Global Development.


Joel Gill (GfGD) and Silvia Peppoloni (IAPG)
The aim of the Memorandum is to collaborate in the promotion of geoethics as an important consideration for all geoscientists, particularly emphasizing the role of geoethics in delivering sustainable development in low-income countries.

GfGD (http://www.gfgd.org/) is a registered charity in England and Wales, existing to champion the role of geology in sustainable international development, mobilizing and reshaping the geology community to help deliver the UN Sustainable Development Goals (2015-2030).

GfGD aims to pursue this vision (in particular, but not exclusively) through the following activities: communications, educational material, training courses, placement opportunities, by promoting research in all aspects of that subject and publishing the useful result, providing grants, equipment and services (in particular but not exclusively education and training in geology) to individuals in need, other charitable organizations, and/or other organizations working to prevent or relieve poverty. The values which underpin the work of GfGD are helpfully articulated by the Cape Town Statement of Geoethics, endorsed by GfGD in 2017, as stated in GfGD’s strategy.


IAPG affiliations and agreements: http://www.geoethics.org/affs-agrs

IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Tuesday, May 23, 2017


Why Nigerian miners should go to Big Church Green





by Greg Odogwu
Greg Odogwu

Member / IAPG-Nigeria





In 2011, more than 400 children died from lead poisoning as a result of artisanal mining in Zamfara State. Five years later, another episode of lead poisoning occurred in Niger State, this time killing about 50 children. Government, international development agencies and local civil society organisations led the process, which ensured that the epidemic was arrested and the locations decontaminated.
But, one has yet to see any robust engagement of miners and businessmen in a process for restructuring mining activities in Nigeria in a way that it would become sustainable and ensure a safe and healthy environment. From all indication, mining is still carried on without giving a thought to best practices and geoethics.

The artisanal miners are not organised; even the ones organized like in the case of coal mining, oil mining, and yes, water mining, the businessmen involved are rapaciously taking from the Earth without any sense of responsibility to her and to the people they find in the location of their mining activities.
Businessmen generally play by unspoken business ethics; but what about geoethics? That is, in a general term, observing ethical behavior while developing geo-resources. Perhaps, professionally the practice of developing and organising these sets of ethics philosophically, socially and geo-scientifically is a relatively new concept globally, and one would then expect that it could still take some time before trickling down to us.
Therefore, indigenous miners would do well to borrow a leaf from one Nigerian who has identified with the emerging field of geoethics: Dr Olakunle Churchill of Big Church Green, a miner and entrepreneur himself.

Although it is a relatively emerging field in geosciences, geoethics is gradually assuming importance because observing ethical behaviour while developing geo-resources or while dealing with geohazards, has become an urgent need in today’s society. Geoscientists have a duty to educate society on prudent and eco-friendly use of these resources, and also to increase the preparedness of society in dealing with geohazards.
Such geo-hazards in Nigeria are lead poisoning discussed above; and the first-of-its-kind tremors experienced in two Nigerian states last year.

We cannot afford to play the ostrich, saying we are so blessed by God that we are sort of ‘exempt’ from natural disasters. The truth is more logical: As we keep on taking from our God-given natural resources, the Earth is stressed, and demands all the sense of conservation and responsibility we can muster.
Take for instance, water mining – we call it "borehole drilling". It is perfectly okay to dig boreholes and extract water if it is of good quality. However, extraction should be not much more than whatever water can get back into aquifer, otherwise, depth of ground water table shall go deeper and all bore well owners shall have to deepen their boreholes at extra costs. If any single individual digs a deeper bore and pumps out more water using more powerful pump, the water table will fall and some shallow bore holes shall go dry.

In India, the geographies where ground water table has gone too deep, any further exploitation is stopped by the government and no more boreholes are allowed. In other areas in the country, rainwater harvesting is encouraged so that aquifers can get water which tube wells shall extract round the year.
In South Africa, citizens are required to register for boreholes and this entails ground water specialists to check and verify if is well suitable for drilling.
Just like in other turfs of socio-economic activities, people need a pioneer or reference point in order to test, accept or replicate commercial trends and innovations. Nigeria’s Churchill could become the poster boy of ethical mining in our sub-region.

For many years, mining has been considered as a non-sustainable activity. This is because mining includes the physical removal of a non-renewable resource from one site for further processing and use. The resource itself is thus not sustainable. Sustainability of mining is a relatively recent concept, which embodies geoethical behaviour towards the society close to the mining area. The concept cannot be left to academics and activists alone to champion.
The issue is simple. The society close to mines is considered to have several types or aspects of capital, such as natural resources capital, educated people or human resources capital, infrastructure, employment opportunities, health services, productive farms, a clean environment, and social institutions. All these are what we can call the social capital, which contributes to a stable social order and community wellbeing.
Due to mining activities in its neighbourhood, the natural resources capital is permanently lost, with possible partial loss in other aspects of capital, like a clean environment. Sustainable mining incorporates compensation for the society towards these losses by increasing several other capital assets mentioned above.
During the operation of mining, various aspects of the capital of the society can be enhanced by the mine developers, like education for children, job opportunities for elders, health services at a company hospital, and the infrastructure for an electricity supply, roads and markets. These would continue during the several years or decades of the mining operation.
However, even after active mining stops, sustainability for the society can be achieved by effective rehabilitation processes.

Shrikant Daji Limaye, Vice-President of IAPG – International Association for Promoting Geoethics (http://www.geoethics.org) and Director of Ground Water Institute (an India-based NGO), discussed an exemplary scenario in his treatise entitled "Observing geoethics in mining and in ground-water development: An Indian experience" (published in the Special Issue: Peppoloni Silvia and Di Capua Giuseppe (Eds.). Geoethics and geological culture. Reflections from the Geoitalia Conference 2011. Annals of Geophysics, 2012, Vol. 55, No 3, p.163 http://www.geoethics.org/geoethicsag).
"One of the coastal cement factories in India used a farmer friendly approach in ground water use. The farmers in the surrounding villages were worried that the factory would pump a lot of ground water from its mining lease areas at high levels, for the construction and operation of the factory, thereby promoting sea-water intrusion into irrigation wells of the farmers located at the lower levels closer to the sea.
The factory authorities declared that they would not pump any ground water from the mining area. The factory entered into an agreement with the farmers that the farmers should supply water to the factory from their wells rather than using it for irrigation and the factory would pay them in cash on a daily basis, which would be much more than what they could earn from the irrigated crops.
After the factory started working at full capacity, it used hot gases in the chimney for sea water desalination for industrial use. The factory also promoted ground water recharge by using the lowest levels of the mine pits as ground-water recharge ponds during the monsoon rainy season. This increased the water availability in the wells of the farmers, and also checked the intrusion of saline water in the aquifer."

It would be germane to remind Big Church Group that because of its niche as one of the mining industry players in Nigeria, it should go beyond identifying with the local IAPG geoethics group; by also incorporating the concept into its ongoing agro-charity projects: The Green Project, where it targets to empower youths from each state of Nigeria.
The youths from the 36 states of the federation should be empowered with knowledge of Geoethics, in order to "catch them young" for environmental sustainability. This will effectively refocus some of them into taking up relevant disciplines in higher education and then be at the vanguard of further institutionalising geoethics both in the academia and at the governmental levels.
Geoethics is promoted by IAPG worldwide as a "tool" to ensure socially responsible behaviour in mining activities. In this sense, Nigeria could become a leader in Africa. 

As Mahatma Gandhi said, God has provided enough resources for everyone’s need not for everyone’s greed.


IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics

Thursday, May 11, 2017


Deforestation and landslide hazard in Malawi: 

a geoethical perspective



by Annie Sylverio Jere
Annie Sylverio Jere


(Geologist at Akatswiri Mineral Resources, IAPG member, Malawi; email: jere.annie@gmail.com)


Picture above: 
2016 landslides induced by rainfalls in Chiweta, Rumphi districts. Landslides have blocked the road (source: http://www.faceofmalawi.com)



Trees have a fundamental role in the conservation of the environment by averting potential natural disasters. Through the absorption of harmful gases, trees save us from dangers resulting from the imbalance of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide occurring in the earth’s atmosphere (Nail, 2008). Moreover, as well known in the agricultural knowledge, trees prevent soil erosion. However, not often mentioned is also the role that trees play in preventing landslides.

Landslides are defined as the downward and outward movement of slope-forming materials under the influence of gravity, and in most cases water is equally involved (Varnes, 1978). Landslides description depends on the nature of their occurrence, they are sometimes called slides/slumps, avalanches, rockfall, and flows (Msilimba, 2007 & Varnes, 1978). Landslides of greater magnitude are mainly associated with failure of slope during earthquakes or rainfalls. The destabilization of materials (rock and soil) forming a slope, changes in water concentration levels and loss of woody vegetation may also trigger landslides (Broadhead and Forbes, 2011). Logging, trail construction, and forest conversion are some of activities that increase erosion and slope instability.

The roots of forestry vegetation help stabilize hill slopes by reinforcing soil shear strength (Abe and Ziemer, 1991).   Deep rooted trees and shrubs have the ability to reinforce shallow soil layers, anchor soil to bedrock, and form buttresses that resist soil movement, making shallow rapidly moving landslides less likely to occur (Broadhead and Forbes, 2011 & FAO and PECOFTC, 2013). Soil moisture levels are also reduced by the forest cover and undergrowth vegetation. This entails that landslides can be minimized or entirely averted though their main cause is natural.

In Malawi, landslides are prevalent in all the three country regions (Msilimba and Holmes, 2010). Quite a number of landslides have been documented in various papers. Most of these landslides are induced by continual heavy rains. Deforestation, which is being driven by rising demand for agricultural land, biomass energy (firewood and charcoal), timber and settlement purposes, is also considered among the main causes for the occurrence of landslides.

In the year 1946, Zomba experienced devastating landslides and floods which affected the Zomba plateau (the second largest mountain in Malawi), due to the heavy rains that fell continuously lasting for a number of days (Edwards, 1948). Landslides coincided with floods that claimed lives of many people, destroyed villages, homes and farms. Until now they are considered as the most catastrophic landslides and floods ever occurred in the district. Because of the destruction they caused, locals called those landslides and floods "Napolo" (a serpent that came to destroy many lives).

Rapid deforestation of sloping hills is attributed to economic activities such as, agricultural practices, logging, mining, development of residential areas, tourism (Broadhead and Forbes, 2011). These activities are the necessary catalysts to induce slope failure since the vegetational roots that are supposed to provide stability to the soil are destroyed (Bischetti et al., 2009). The recent deforestation in the Zomba Mountain has increased tremendously following the rapid growth of population. Trees are also being cut down for timber and the creation of space for farming and settlements. The inconsiderate deforestation of the mountain may result in the occurrence of landslides in the near future if no proper action is taken. Removal of forests from sloping land surely increase landslide risks. Even after the forestal regeneration, high landslide hazard remains, since the rooting strength may take up to two decades to recover to previous levels (FAO and PECOFTC, 2013).


Zomba Mountain, with the extent of deforestation,
and part of Zomba City
The removal of forest or brush cover and the replacement with grass or crops has often been found to substantially increase the susceptibility of hill slopes to landslides (Glade, 1998). Forests are also significant as they also serve as an effective barrier against rock, debris and soil falls from higher elevations, as well as to diminish the distance of the landslide run-out (FAO and PECOFTC, 2013). Grasses, which have shallow roots, take up most of the land when all trees have been cut down, as a result the slope becomes susceptible to the instability (Broadhead and Forbes, 2011).

The foot of Zomba Mountain hosts a city that in the future will be likely affected by even more deadly and devastating landslides than in the past. The occurrence of landslides may also damage the drainage systems, destroy riparian vegetation, induce soil erosion, accelerate the land degradation of the hill slopes, and reduce the scenic beauty of the mountain (Msilimba, 2007). Even though important policies have been implemented, Zomba population should be sensitized more on the importance of preserving trees in the mountain. Energy Statistics Database (1990) showed that more than 60% households in Malawi use firewood and charcoal for cooking (Broadhead, 2016). So, developing alternative sources of energy will contribute to prevent deforestation and reduce the landslide hazard, with positive repercussions on the protection of the natural environment and the safety of population.


References

Abe K. and Ziemer R.R. (1991). Effect of Tree Roots on Shallow-Seated Landslide. Proceedings, Geomorphic Hazard in Managed Forests. XIV IUFRO World Congress, 5-11 August 1990, Montreal, Canada, USDA  Forest Service Gen. Tech. Report PSW-130, Berkeley, California.
Bischetti G.B., Chiaradia E.A., Epis T., Morlotti, E. (2009). Root cohesion of forest species in the Italian Alps. Plant Soil (Impress), Doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9941-0.
Broadhead J. & Forbes K. (2011). Forests and landslides: The role of Trees and Forests in the Prevention of Landslides and Rehabilitation of Landslide-Affected Areas in Asia. FAO, Bangkok.
Broadhead J. (2016). Nation al statistics Related to Woodfuel Production and Consumption Developing Countries, Survey-Based Woodfuel Studies, and International Recommendations on Woodfuel Surveys. Technical Report Series GO-17-2016.
Edwards T.A.C. (1948). Zomba Floods, December, 1946; Extracted from The Nyasaland Journal, 1.
FAO & The Centre for People and Forests (RECOFTC) (2013). Forest and Natural Disaster Risk Reduction in Asia and the Pacific. Brief Policy.
Glade T. (1998). Establishing the Frequency and Magnitude of Landslide-Triggering Rainstorm Events in New Zealand. Environmental Geology, 35.
Holmes P.J. & Msilimba G.G. (2010). Landslides in the Rumphi District of Northern Malawi: Characteristics and Mechanisms of Generation. Nat Hazards. Doi:10.1007/s11069009-9495.
Msilimba G.G. (2007). A Comparative Study of Landslides and Geo hazard Mitigation in Northern and Central Malawi: Thesis Submitted for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree,        Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, Department of Geography, University of    the Free State.
Nail S. (2008). Forest Policies and Social Change in England. Springer Science and Business Media. World Forest, Vol. 6.
Varnes D.J. (1978). Slope Movement Types and Proccesses, Landslides-Analysis and Control in Schuster R.L and Krizek R.J., National Research Council. Washington D.C. Transportation Research Board. Special Report 176.

Wednesday, May 10, 2017




Slides, posters and photogallery 
of the IAPG session on geoethics at EGU 2017


Geoethics is a well-established presence within the EGU General Assemblies. Starting from the first session in 2012, the interest in ethical and social issues related to geosciences has rapidly grown, years after years the spectrum of the treated topics has become wider. 

This year in the session program we have had 12 orals and 22 posters, a great success considering the novelty of the abstract fee introduced also for the Outreach, Education, and Media sessions.

Presentations have been authored by 75 colleagues from 19 countries (Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Russia, Senegal, Switzerland, Tanzania, United Kingdom, USA).

Presentations have covered a wide spectrum of geoethical issues, including theoretical aspects of geoethics, geoscience professionalism, ethical implications in geoscience communication, information, education, geo-hazards and data management, mining, geoparks, ocean science, geo-archeology, forensic geology, data science policies, citizen science.

Slides and posters of several presentations are available at:
http://www.geoethics.org/egu2017-eos14

A photogallery is available at:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/125283529@N05/sets/72157680720406712



IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Thursday, May 4, 2017


IAPG-Pakistan officially presented



Muhammad Yaseen during his talk
Muhammad Yaseen, IAPG-Pakistan coordinator, presented the new IAPG national section at the Department of Geology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, in the one-day seminar on 6th April 2017 entitled "Earth-Science - Opportunities for Geo-scientists".

Great job Yaseen!

Read more: 
http://awkumpk.blogspot.it/2017/04/department-of-geology-organized-one-day.html


IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Thursday, April 20, 2017



EGU GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2017

Geoethics: ethical, social and cultural implications of geoscience knowledge, education, research and practice

PROGRAMME OF THE SESSION EOS14 
ORGANIZED BY IAPG 

Vienna (Austria)



Oral presentations: 26 April 2017, 13:30-15:00, 15:30-17:00; Room L4/5

Poster presentations: 26 April 2017, 08:00-19:30, attendance 17:30-19:00; Hall X4


Oral presentations (26 April 2017 - Room L4/5)
(Read abstracts at: http://www.geoethics.org/egu2017-eos14)

First Part
Defining and communicating Geoethics
Chairperson: Silvia Peppoloni & Nic Bilham

13:30–13:45
Reflections on the fundamentals of Geoethics 
Stefano Tinti and Alberto Armigliato

13:45–14:00
Rewind, review, reflect and fast forward: from Ethics to GeoEthics
Eduardo Marone

14:00–14:15
From infotainment to tools of interaction - A critical perspective on the use of film/video in geoscience
Johanna Ickert

14:15–14:30
The ethics of educational methods to teach geoethics
Pimnutcha Promduangsri and David Crookall

14:30–14:45
'Anthropocene': An Ethical Crisis, Not a Geological Epoch
Chris Cuomo

14:45–15:00
Citizen-science, Geoethics and Human Niche

Martin Bohle

15:00–15:30 Coffee Break

Second Part
Operationalising Geoethics: professional, institutional and industrial perspectives
Chairperson: Giuseppe di Capua & Martin Bohle

15:30–15:45
A practical guide to ethical and effective delivery of geoscience for the service of society
Ruth Allington

15:45–16:00
Natural Hazards and the Normative Significance of Expectations in Protecting Alpine Communities
Florian Ortner, Thomas Pölzler, Lukas H. Meyer, and Oliver Sass

16:00–16:15
Ethical implication of providing scientific data and services to diverse stakeholders: the case of the EPOS research infrastructure
Carmela Freda, Kuvvet Atakan, and Massimo Cocco

16:15–16:30
Avenue for integrating geoethics into the working world
Jan Boon

16:30–16:45
Negotiating a new social contract for the extractive industries: what is the role of geoscientists?
Nic Bilham

16:45–17:00
New geoethic challenges in the framework of the UNESCO Global Geoparks
Elizabeth Silva and Artur Sá


Poster presentations (Attendance Time: Wednesday, 26 Apr, 17:30–19:00)

Chairperson: Eduardo Marone & Giuseppe Di Capua

X4.507
The Cape Town Statement on Geoethics
Giuseppe Di Capua, Silvia Peppoloni, and Peter Bobrowsky

X4.508
Ethical considerations in developing the next generation of geoscientists and defining a common cause for the geosciences
Christopher Keane and Maeve Boland

X4.510
How much are researchers aware of the ethical and social implications of their activities? The example of the European Project ENVRI Plus
Silvia Peppoloni, Giuseppe Di Capua, and Florian Haslinger

X4.511
Harassment as an Ethics Issue
Mary Anne Holmes, Erika Marin-Spiotta, and Blair Schneider

X4.512
Scientific Integrity and Professional Ethics at AGU – Strategies and Actions to Impact Sexual Harassment in Science and other Work Climate Issues 
Michael McPhaden, Eric Davidson, Christine McEntee, and Billy Williams

X4.513
On the necessity of making geoethics a central concern in eduethics world-wide
David Crookall and Pimnutcha Promduangsri

X4.514
Improving metacognitive skills in geosciences to preserve the quality of divulged information
Massimo Arattano and Albertina Gatti

X4.515
Incorporating geoethics into environmental engineering lectures – three years of experience from international students visiting Iceland
David C. Finger

X4.516
A questionnaire for teachers to improve training activity and students on environmental science in the frame of ENVRIPLUS project
Giuliana D'Addezio, Antonella Marsili, and Laura Beranzoli

X4.517
Media and experts: setting the agenda of the debate in an on going seismic sequence
Gemma Musacchio and Giovanna L Piangiamore

X4.518
The natural disasters and the urban asset modifications: the Melito Irpino case history.
Sabina Porfido and Efisio Spiga

X4.519
Towards to Resilience Science -Research on the Nankai through seismogenic zone- 
Yoshiyuki Kaneda, Wataru Shiraki, Kazuhito Fujisawa, and Eiji Tokozakura

X4.520
Environmental, Disaster and Crisis Management Strategies: Interdisciplinarity and Synergy in Postgraduate Studies
Efthymis Lekkas, Emmanouil Andreadakis, Paraskevi Nomikou, Varvara Antoniou, Eleni Kapourani, and Konstantinos Papaspyropoulos

X4.521
Knowledge of seismic hazard for the preservation of cultural heritage: the case study of Naples (Southern Italy)
Sabina Porfido, Giuliana Alessio, Germana Gaudiosi, Rosa Nappi, and Efisio Spiga

X4.522
Impact of Geological Changes on Regional and Global Economies 
Skufina Tatiana, Skuf’in Peter, Samarina Vera, Shatalova Taisiya, and Sergey Baranov

X4.523
Geoethical implications for geoarchaeology. The Laacher See and AD 536 case studies 
Felix Riede, Neil Price, and Per Andersen

X4.524
The contamination of scientific literature: looking for an antidote
Marcello Liotta

X4.525
Criminal fisheries practices and their perverse effects in West Africa
Aliou Sall and Cornelia E. Nauen

X4.526
Implementation of the geoethics principal to environmental technologies by Biogeosystem Technique 
Abdulmalik Batukaev, Valery Kalinitchenko, Tatiana Minkina, Saglara Mandzhieva, and Svetlana Sushkova

X4.527
Geoethics – A Message from the Field in Tanzania
Athumani Amiry Sabuni and Martin Bohle

X4.528
Geoethics and Forensic Geology
Laurance Donnelly



See you in Vienna on 26 April 2017!



IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Saturday, April 8, 2017


IAPG and IUGS-IFG signed an agreement for cooperation



On 7th April 2017, IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics and IUGS-IFG - Initiative on Forensic Geology has signed an agreement for cooperation.

The agreement expresses a mutual desire to co-operate on a range of issues in the field of geoethics and forensic geology:
  • Promoting principles of geoethics, research integrity and best practices in forensic geology within their networks;
  • Cooperating in teaching and training events on forensic geology, by introducing issues of geoethics;
  • Co-organising scientific and dissemination events about (geo)ethical and social implications in forensic geology;
  • Identifying of possibilities to apply for funding for the development of common projects on geoethics and forensic geology.
Both organisations will establish a liaison link to ensure good information flow and cooperation and will add respective logos in their websites.

The IUGS-IFG was established at UNESCO headquarters in Paris, France, on 22 February 2011, and its aim is “to develop forensic geology internationally and promote its applications”. IUGS-IFG aims to raise the global awareness of forensic geology by holding meetings and conferences, promoting research, teaching, training and the operational deployment of forensic geologists, and developing an international network (Geoforensic International Network - GIN) whereby each ‘member’ will act as a principal contact in their respective country for the collation and dissemination of information on forensic geology. The IUGS-IFG Committee comprises representatives from major geographical regions of the world and includes specialists from; academia, industry, consultancy, operationally based forensic geologists, the police, law enforcement agencies and forensic organisations. Both IUGS-IFG and the Geoforensic International Network (GIN), currently including more than 35 countries, bring together forensic geologists, geoscientists and invited police/law enforcement officers from around the world, who have a desire and interest in the development of forensic geology. 
Website: http://www.forensicgeologyinternational.org/

IAPG affiliations and agreements: http://www.geoethics.org/affs-agrs



IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Friday, April 7, 2017


Geoethics, professionalism and me – 
social and ethical responsibilities of the 21st century geoscientist



Nic Bilham gives a talk at the GSL (Geological Society of London) - Western Regional Group on 18th April 2017 entitled "Geoethics, professionalism and me – social and ethical responsibilities of the 21st century geoscientist".

Abstract
Geoethics is an increasingly visible topic. Sessions explicitly addressing ethical dilemmas and ethical practice in a range of geological specialisms and sectors now regularly feature in international meetings. Learned and professional bodies including the Geological Society, American Geosciences Institute (AGI) and American Geophysical Union (AGU) are increasingly addressing a wide range of ethical challenges in our science, and explicitly linking ethical and professional behaviours. 
Why is this happening – and does it matter? The work of geoscientists has always had ethical, social and political drivers and consequences, whether or not we have recognised these linkages, from understanding and living with natural hazards to infrastructure development and the provision of energy, water and mineral resources.  Geoscientists now have more important roles than ever to play in addressing urgent new (or newly recognised) challenges faced by humanity, as we seek to live sustainably and equitably on our crowded planet. But these challenges are complex, interdisciplinary and politically and publicly contested.  We are therefore likely to find ourselves thrust into (sometimes fraught) ethical battles, whether we like it or not.
In this talk I will highlight some of the geoethical challenges we now face, explore the link between ethical and professional behaviours, and consider the role of learned and professional bodies like the Geological Society in supporting geoscientists as they seek to play their rightful part in society.  I will outline the work of the International Association for Promoting Geoethics (IAPG) to put geoethics at the heart of all geoscience, rather than treat it as a fringe interest for a few specialists. I will also discuss the opportunity this 'ethical turn' in geoscientific thinking presents to demonstrate the huge benefits our science provides to society, and its potential to help to deliver global social justice.

Biography
Nic Bilham is Director of Policy and Communications at the Geological Society, where he has worked since 1997 in a variety of roles. With his team he is responsible for the Society's education activities, engagement with policy-makers, communications through social and traditional media, links with other organisations in the UK and internationally, and development of the Society's science programme. He also leads on strategy development, working with Council and staff colleagues.
Nic's first degree was in History and Philosophy of Science (University of Cambridge), and has an MSc in Science and Technology Policy (University of Sussex). He is European Coordinator and an Executive Committee member of the International Association for Promoting Geoethics (IAPG), and a trustee of Geology for Global Development (GfGD).


IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Wednesday, April 5, 2017


IAPG and IAH signed an agreement for cooperation



On 5th April 2017, IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics and IAH - International Association of Hydrogeologists has signed an agreement for cooperation.

The agreement expresses a mutual desire to co-operate on a range of issues in the field of geoethics and groundwater, in particular, the following affairs:

  • promoting the principles of geoethics, research integrity and best practices in use of groundwater within their networks;
  • cooperating in teaching and training events on groundwater, by introducing issues of geoethics;
  • co-organising scientific and dissemination events about (geo)ethical and social implications of groundwater use;
  • identifying possibilities to apply for funding for the development of common projects on geoethics and groundwater.

Both organisations will establish a liaison link to ensure good information flow and cooperation and will add respective logos to their websites.

IAH is an international scientific and educational professional association whose aims are to promote research into and understanding of the occurrence and importance of groundwater and its sound management and protection for the common good throughout the world: https://iah.org/


IAPG affiliations and agreements: http://www.geoethics.org/affs-agrs


IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Friday, March 31, 2017


Geoethics at CINAREM '17



Yurisley Valdes Mariño
Thanks to our section IAPG-Cuba, leaded by Yurisley Valdes Mariño, geoethics has been included among the topics of CINAREM '17 - IX International Conference on The Better use of Mineral Resources, that will be held from 14 to 16 November 2017 in Cuba, at the Instituto Superior Minero Metalúrgico de Moa.

The Conference is entitled "FOR A SUSTAINABLE MINING DEVELOPMENT"

IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics is partner of CINAREM '17.

Download the official announcement here:
http://media.wix.com/ugd/5195a5_dc5b55d100a143aaac77d4d9bb989607.pdf

Other IAPG events: http://www.geoethics.org/events


IAPG - International Association for Promoting Geoethics: 
http://www.geoethics.org

Thursday, March 30, 2017


The IAPG section of Pakistan


Welcome to the IAPG section of Pakistan! 

The section will work under the responsibility of Muhammad Yaseen and Emad Ullah Khan, Lecturers at the Department of Geology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan.

Currently IAPG-Pakistan can count on 33 members.

Facebook page of IAPG-Pakistan: 
https://www.facebook.com/IAPG-Pakistan-Chapter-737717273072866/


Muhammad Yaseen
Muhammad Yaseen works as Lecturer in the Department of Geology at the Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (Pakistan). He got a Merit Certificate of the Department of Geology at University of Peshawar in 2013. He has worked in different national and international research projects funded by Schlumberger, PPL and HDIP Pakistan. He worked as Assistant Geologist at Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Oil & Gas Company Limited (KPOGCL), where he carried out project activities on shale gas, shale oil and tight gas study (SSTS) and on the assessment of shale gas potential of upper Indus Basin by integrating geological, geochemical and petrophysical data. He has been involved in mapping for more than 5 years, contributing to, or coordinating 2 published and 2 still unpublished geological maps in the areas of the Peshawar Basin. He started his studies in petrophysics and structural geology, but working on sedimentary & metamorphic terranes, he also became interested in sedimentary petrology and sedimentology. He coordinated or contributed to geological reports and technical studies of Peshawar Basin and adjoining FATA areas.


Emad Ullah Khan
Emad Ullah Khan works as Lecturer in the Department of Geology at the Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (Pakistan). Before joining AWKUM he worked as visiting lecturer at University of Malakand. He did his Mphil in the Department of Earth Sciences, Quaid-e-Azam, Islamabad in 2015. He got his Bachelors in Earth Sciences at COMSATS, Abbottabad, in 2012. His expertise is in the field of carbonate sedimentology focusing on the dolomitization process, geochemistry & reservoir characterization..




Other IAPG national sections: http://www.geoethics.org/sections.html